05/02/2024
Carlos Alsina interviewed this Monday on the program ‘Más de uno’ the former prosecutor of the Villarejo case and author of the book ‘El complot’, Ignacio Stampa. These are the headlines that the interview left:
“I have not made a suit for the attorney general, Alvaro García Ortiz. Others must have done it, I limit myself to giving information.”
“I have no opinion, I see what happened.”
“I wrote the book because I couldn’t continue feeling like I was covering up what happened.”
“The general interest of prosecutors cannot be confused with the general interest of prosecutors. Right now there is some confusion.”
“All the illegalities that were done to me have now been changed so that those illegalities can be done now.”
“I intend to expose it so that it happens again to another prosecutor or another person.”
“He had been investigating Villarejo for 38 months.”
“It all starts with some chats from Mr. Calvente.”
“It is published that the other prosecutor and I are leaking information to Podemos and the hook is that I have a relationship with the lawyer.”
“This is very typical of the Villarejo factory.”
“The fact of separating the couple of prosecutors will benefit several people and that Mr. Garzón had an interest in the procedure because it appeared in the audios, it was clear.”
“Garzón made many statements attacking the prosecutors and saying that the detention of Mr. García Castaño was illegal.”
“It seemed to us that there were some personal ties that should prevent Dolores García Delgado from intervening in the Fiscal Council that decides the positions.”
“I wanted to capture what happened in the book so that it remains forever.”
“Mr. García Navaja was absent from a vote for a contest that I opted for.”
“I still want them to explain to me why Mr. Navajas was not there, when in the year 22 he said that he would have voted for me, but that he could not be in the voting and deliberation.”
“I didn’t understand that humiliation, those constant press releases.”
“People find out about the files that are being opened for me because the press office of the State Attorney General’s Office, directed by Dolores Delgado, is the one that gives air to those events. “They would have an interest in Miguel Serrano and I not continuing together.”
“I was nobody, I was an official. The attack was against the procedure.”
“I was the most vilified. “It is ordered that only me be investigated.”
“The State Attorney’s Office has recognized that there were two of us certified anti-corruption prosecutors, the ones who were denounced.”
“I denounce that there has been corruption in the public and private spheres as far as it is concerned.”
“There is an opacity and a lack of total transparency.”
“The former State Attorney General, Dolores Delgado, commits corruption in terms of the community directive.”
“The Supreme Court has said that the current State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, incurred a misuse of power because he did what he wanted.”
“Corruption is my opinion based on the community legal system.”
“I had to leave totally humiliated to a destination where I was doing wonderfully well.”
“Information is disseminated that links Dolores Delgados and Baltasar Garzón to projects related to a shipping businessman in Guatemala.”
“The then attorney general began to deny it.”
“There were recordings that were released and were not in the summary. “It was an attack from outside to inside the procedure.”
“They blamed us for the leaks.”
“We proposed that professionals from other sectors and the media be investigated.”
“The Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office requested the indictment of the journalist who filed 18 complaints against me and who cheered up the entire campaign. She came to Madrid and when they finished with me she left.”
“In the journalistic branch we did not reach any conclusion to reach the accusation. Then he came to the journalist María Montero.”
“The State Attorney General appeared in Villarejo audios. The person close to him, Baltasar Garzón, too.”
“They could be interested in weakening the procedure.”
“When I discovered that the state attorney general is secretly directing the investigation against me, I was perplexed.”
“This has been done by two very specific people.”
“What they have done with me is a misuse of power.”
“I would like this to be resolved in the courts, but they don’t give me the documents.”